Some of the evidence presented in this case bears upon defendant’s contention that plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident. This contention is not relevant in deciding who is at fault for causing the accident. However, it may be important in determining the amount of money that the plaintiff may recover for any injuries he/she received. I will talk about that with you in a few minutes.
Recognition held by some of our attorneys:
*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. For the comparison standards employed by the various lawyer rating companies, please visit superlawyers.com, bestlawyers.com, milliondollaradvocates.com, law.com, avvo.com, and thenationaltriallawyers.org. Award is conferred on at least 100 lawyers per state, not 100 lawyers in America. Prior Results do not guarantee a similar outcome, nor does visiting this website create an attorney client relationship.*
Don’t hesitate. Don’t wonder. Don’t field questions from aggressive insurance companies. Contact Gill & Chamas, LLC today.